MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040713746 · doi:10.1063/1.2987975

A versatile high-resolution x-ray imager (HRXI) for laser-plasma experiments on OMEGA

2008· article· en· W2040713746 on OpenAlexaff
J. L. Bourgade, Ph. Troussel, A. Casner, G. Hüser, T. C. Sangster, G. Pien, F. J. Marshall, J. Fariaud, C. Rémond, D. Gontier, C. Chollet, C. Zuber, C. Reverdin, A. Richard, P. A. Jaanimagi, R. L. Keck, R. Bahr, William Armstrong, J. L. Dewandel, R. Maroni, F. Aubard, B. Angelier, C. Y. Côté, S. Magnan

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsAxis Photonique (Canada)
FundersNew York State Energy Research and Development AuthorityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsStreak cameraOpticsOmegaStreakLaserImage resolutionPlasmaResolution (logic)Plasma diagnosticsTemporal resolutionPhysicsX-rayMicroscopeHigh resolutionRemote sensingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-resolution x-ray imager (HRXI) devoted to laser-plasma experiments combines two state-of-the-art technologies developed in France: a high-resolution x-ray microscope and a high-speed x-ray streak camera. The resulting streaked imager achieves spatial and temporal resolutions of approximately 5 microm and approximately 10 ps, respectively. The HXRI has recorded enhanced spatial and temporal resolution radiographs of indirectly driven targets on OMEGA. This paper describes the main features of the instrument and details the activation process on OMEGA (particularly the alignment). Recent results obtained on joint CEA/LLE radiographic OMEGA experiments will also be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207