MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040723905 · doi:10.1109/ciss.2014.6814100

Joint user association and resource allocation in small cell networks with backhaul constraints

2014· article· en· W2040723905 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationMaximizationComputer networkResource allocationSmall cellOverlayCellular networkDistributed computingBase stationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterogeneous networks potentially provide significant capacity gains by overlaying the traditional cellular network with a layer of small cells (SCs) served by access points (APs). However, the limited backhaul capacity of the SC APs, combined with increased interference from neighboring cells, necessitates careful resource allocation to realize the gains. In our work, we consider maximization of the weighted sum rate in small cell networks with carrier aggregation while enforcing a backhaul constraint on each SC AP. We propose an efficient, waterfilling-like, algorithm which converges to a locally optimal solution of the non-convex optimization problem. This algorithm differs from existing works by using a computationally efficient bisection-like search that ensures the sum-power and sum-rate constraints at each AP are satisfied via an one-dimensional search. An added advantage is that this approach also allows for a decentralized implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207