MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Derived Flow–Duration Relationships for Surface Runoff Dominated Small Urban Streams

2008· article· en· W2040810265 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiping Guo, Asif Quader

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydrologic Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBaseflowSTREAMSStreamflowSurface runoffEnvironmental scienceDuration (music)Hydrology (agriculture)Flow (mathematics)Drainage basinMathematicsGeologyGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For many locations, exponential probability distributions fit well the frequency distributions of rainfall event volume, duration, and interevent time. Based on these exponential distributions and a simplified scheme for rainfall-streamflow transformation, closed-form analytical expressions were derived for the determination of the flow–duration relationships of surface runoff dominated small urban streams. The main advantage of the derived analytical relationships is that they relate the flow–duration characteristics of a stream directly to its upstream catchment’s and local rainfall characteristics. Using the derived relationships, flow–duration curves that are needed for stream restoration design can be directly constructed for small urban streams without observed streamflow data. Verification studies demonstrated that simplifying assumptions invoked in the derivation process are generally acceptable for small urban streams where baseflow variations are insignificant or streamflows are generated predominantly by surface runoff.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydrologic EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207