MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Zeros of Partial Sums of the Riemann Zeta Function

2007· article· en· W2040817643 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMeromorphic and Entire Functions
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsMathematicsRiemann zeta functionRiemann hypothesisBounding overwatchFunction (biology)Prime zeta functionParticular values of Riemann zeta functionPrime (order theory)Arithmetic zeta functionExplicit formulaeCombinatoricsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The semiperiodic behavior of the zeta function ζ(s) and its partial sums ζN(s) as a function of the imaginary coordinate has been long established. In fact, the zeros of a ζN(s), when reduced into imaginary periods derived from primes less than or equal to N, establish regular patterns. We show that these zeros can be embedded as a dense set in the period of a surface in ℝk+1, where k is the number of primes in the expansion. This enables us, for example, to establish the lower bound for the real parts of zeros of ζN(s) for prime N and justifies the use of methods of calculus to find expressions for the bounding curves for sets of reduced zeros in ℂ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it