MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040845779 · doi:10.2118/117354-ms

Novel Approach to High Water Cut Measurement in a Mature Oil Field

2008· article· en· W2040845779 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGravimetric analysisPetroleum engineeringCalibrationWater cutOil fieldEnvironmental scienceBlock (permutation group theory)PetroleumVolume (thermodynamics)Accuracy and precisionProcess engineeringMathematicsStatisticsEngineeringGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Canadian Nexen Petroleum Yemen (CNPY) produces two million barrels of fluid per day at 95 percent watercut from the Masila Block (Block 14) in Yemen. Asset development decisions are based on numerous factors, one of the most important being the amount of oil produced from a well. With increasing oil price, it is becoming economically feasible to produce wells at significantly higher watercuts. The analytical variability of volumetric methods used in Block 14 to measure watercut restricts the accuracy and precision of these measurements. The authors developed a robust and reproducible water cut determination method for this mature petroleum asset based on gravimetric measurement of oil and water phases. The gravimetric measurement approach follows the volumetric method procedures but uses a balance to weigh the oil or water fractions. To keep consistent with historical reporting of oil production, the density of each phase is then used to correct the values to a volume basis. The methodology outperforms the volumetric determination of water cut by being more reproducible (better precision) and allowing for the accurate measurement of water cuts up to 99.5 percent. In side by side comparison of the gravimetric and volumetric methods at 99.5 percent water cut, the gravimetric methodology showed a five fold increase in accuracy. In addition, the gravimetric method provides six to ten times better precision in the measurement of watercut on representative field samples compared to the volumetric methodology. The program at Block 14 investigated the use of a reference calibration matrix standard as a data quality system to establish the detection limits of the methodology and to institute a testing procedure to monitor laboratory performance. The increased accuracy and precision in watercut measurement gives reservoir engineers the confidence to make economic decisions on well viability to maximize overall project NPV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it