MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040866439 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m603912200

CCL5-CCR5-mediated Apoptosis in T Cells

2006· article· en· W2040866439 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas T. Murooka, Mark Wong, Ramtin Rahbar, Beata Majchrzak-Kita, Amanda E. I. Proudfoot, Eleanor N. Fish

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCCL5ApoptosisCell biologyChemistryMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistryCytotoxic T cellIn vitroIL-2 receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CCL5 (RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted)) and its cognate receptor, CCR5, have been implicated in T cell activation. CCL5 binding to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on the cell surface or in extracellular matrix sequesters CCL5, thereby immobilizing CCL5 to provide the directional signal. In two CCR5-expressing human T cell lines, PM1.CCR5 and MOLT4.CCR5, and in human peripheral blood-derived T cells, micromolar concentrations of CCL5 induce apoptosis. CCL5-induced cell death involves the cytosolic release of cytochrome c, the activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage. CCL5-induced apoptosis is CCR5-dependent, since native PM1 and MOLT4 cells lacking CCR5 expression are resistant to CCL5-induced cell death. Furthermore, we implicate tyrosine 339 as a critical residue involved in CCL5-induced apoptosis, since PM1 cells expressing a tyrosine mutant receptor, CCR5Y339F, do not undergo apoptosis. We show that CCL5-CCR5-mediated apoptosis is dependent on cell surface GAG binding. The addition of exogenous heparin and chondroitin sulfate and GAG digestion from the cell surface protect cells from apoptosis. Moreover, the non-GAG binding variant, (44AANA47)-CCL5, fails to induce apoptosis. To address the role of aggregation in CCL5-mediated apoptosis, nonaggregating CCL5 mutant E66S, which forms dimers, and E26A, which form tetramers at micromolar concentrations, were utilized. Unlike native CCL5, the E66S mutant fails to induce apoptosis, suggesting that tetramers are the minimal higher ordered CCL5 aggregates required for CCL5-induced apoptosis. Viewed altogether, these data suggest that CCL5-GAG binding and CCL5 aggregation are important for CCL5 activity in T cells, specifically in the context of CCR5-mediated apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207