MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040869100 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334996

Improved torque sharing in multi induction motor VFD systems using current feedback

2012· article· en· W2040869100 on OpenAlex
Jaishankar Iyer, Mehrdad Chapariha, Francis Therrien, Juri Jatskevich

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorqueRotor (electric)Induction motorControl theory (sociology)Direct torque controlComputer scienceVariable-frequency driveVariable (mathematics)VoltControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)VoltageElectrical engineeringPower (physics)PhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an improved method for sharing the torques between two rigidly coupled Induction Motors (IMs) that may have different parameters. The Volts-per-Hertz (V/F) control forms a large percentage of variable frequency drives (VFD) used in industry. The torque delivered by V/F controlled IMs is highly dependent on the rotor resistance, which may be susceptible to various external factors. As a result, the torque developed by the individual IMs under load may not be properly shared. The proposed methodology is verified and demonstrated experimentally, and is shown to improve the load sharing very effectively under significant variation in machine parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207