MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040870428 · doi:10.1115/1.1765139

Multi Frequency Solution of Chatter Stability for Low Immersion Milling

2004· article· en· W2040870428 on OpenAlexaff
S. Doruk Merdol, Yusuf Altıntaş

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsTransfer functionMachiningVibrationStability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)Immersion (mathematics)Natural frequencyMechanicsMaterials scienceEngineeringAcousticsMechanical engineeringMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finish milling is usually required in the peripheral milling of thin aircraft webs with long end mills, where the structures are flexible and radial depths of cut are small. The spindle speed and depth of cut must be selected optimally to avoid both forced and chatter vibrations, which in turn enables production of the parts within specified tolerances. Recent articles show that stability pockets differ at certain speeds when the radial immersion in milling is low and the machining process is highly intermittent. This paper presents a stability theory which predicts chatter stability lobes that are not covered by classical chatter theories in which the coupling between the spindle speed and process stability are neglected. The dynamics of low radial immersion milling are formulated as an eigenvalue problem, where harmonics of the tooth spacing angle and spread of the transfer function with the harmonics of the tooth passing frequencies are considered. It is shown that the stability lobes are accurately predicted with the presented method. This paper details the physics involved when the tooth passing frequencies alter the effective transfer function of the structure in the stability solution. The products of the harmonics of the directional coefficients and transfer functions of the structure are evaluated at the natural mode under the influence of tooth passing frequency harmonics in order to obtain the exact locations of chatter stability lobes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations504
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207