MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W204091404 · doi:10.25071/2291-3637.36229

Nixon’s Foreign Policy in Chile: Economic Securities over Human Rights

2012· article· en· W204091404 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chris Vanden Berg

Bibliographic record

VenueHPS The Journal of History and Political Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman rightsBusinessPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historians have often misunderstood Nixon's interest in Latin American countries such as Chile during his time in the Oval Office, declaring the region to be of little importance to the former US President. 1 Even Nixon himself once remarked "Latin America doesn't matter […] people don't give one damn about Latin America […] the only thing that matters in the world is Japan, China, Russia and Europe." 2 Yet throughout the 1990s and 2000s, the release of new tapes and transcripts has exposed Nixon's involvement in Latin America, particularly in Chile.Documented conversations between Nixon, the Secretary of State, and other high-ranking officials indicate Nixon's willingness to manipulate Chilean politics in order to advance economic securities for the United States.Action was taken by Nixon to prevent the 1973 election of the Socialist Party of Chile under Salvador Allende, overthrow his government, and to support the subsequent Chilean military dictatorship under Augusto Pinochet.American intervention cost many Chilean lives, reduced human rights, and benefited only a select amount of the population, while in turn economically benefiting the United States.Nixon's attitude and policy towards Latin America should thereby not be remembered as uninterested or passive, but rather as active, aggressive, and destructive. First ImpressionsIn May 1958, Richard Nixon, then Vice President, embarked on a goodwill trip to Latin America.The Cold War was in full swing, and countries in Latin America were complaining that they needed economic assistance, instead of the arms which America was providing them in order to be able to extinguish communist forces.Many in Latin America believed that economic growth was more urgent than repelling communist influences.Nixon's trip was meant to clarify to these nations the advantages of receiving arms, as well as to discuss future plans for economic 1 Mark Atwood Lawrence, "History from Below: The United States and Latin America in the Nixon Years," In Nixon in the World: American Foreign Relations,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHPS The Journal of History and Political ScienceSame topicPolitical and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207