HfSb<sub>2–<i>x</i></sub>Te<i><sub>x</sub></i>: The Second New Compound on the Quasi‐Binary Section HfSb<sub>2</sub>‐HfTe<sub>2</sub> with Different Sb–Sb Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thus far, three different ribbons and layers of antimony atoms with various Sb–Sb bonds were found in Hf 5 Sb 9 , HfSb 2 and HfSbTe. We uncovered a new variant when trying to dope Hf 5 Sb 9 with tellurium atoms, namely HfSb 2– x Te x , with 0.4 ≤ x ≤ 0.7. HfSb 2– x Te x adopts the monoclinic OsGe 2 type, space group C 2/ m , a = 10.5216(8) Å, b = 3.7142(3) Å, c = 8.5924(7) Å, β = 11.571(1), V = 292.05(4) Å 3 ( Z = 4) when x = 0.5. This structure is composed of a layer of puckered six‐membered rings of antimony atoms, with Sb–Sb distances of 2.82 and 3.12 Å. The different antimony atom substructures are compared in this article. Independent of the exact Sb/Te ratio, monoclinic HfSb 2– x Te x is predicted to be metallic, as are Hf 5 Sb 9 , HfSb 2 and orthorhombic HfSbTe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".