MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040973688 · doi:10.1080/01902140490451244

PULMONARY ELASTIN SYNTHESIS AND DEPOSITION IN DEVELOPING AND MATURE SHEEP: EFFECTS OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION

2004· article· en· W2040973688 on OpenAlexaff
Megan L. Cock, Belinda J. Joyce, Stuart B. Hooper, Megan J. Wallace, Robert Gagnon, Robert A. Brace, Samantha Louey, Richard Harding

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Lung Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElastinTropoelastinFetusInternal medicineEndocrinologyLungHypoxemiaGestationHypoxia (environmental)Intrauterine growth restrictionBiologyMedicineChemistryPregnancyPathologyOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypoxia and nutrient restriction during gestation restrict fetal growth and alter lung development. As elastin is intimately involved in lung development, our aim was to assess pulmonary elastin synthesis and deposition following intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) induced by umbilicoplacental embolization (UPE). Pulmonary tropoelastin expression and elastin content were examined at 128 days (5 days UPE) and 140 days (20 days UPE) of the 147- days gestation and at 8 weeks and 2.3 years after birth (both approximately 27 days UPE) in sheep. UPE induced hypoxemia, hypoglycemia, and fetal growth restriction but did not affect pulmonary tropoelastin mRNA levels or elastin deposition at any age; furthermore, elastin content was unaltered apart from being lower at 140 days. The authors conclude that hypoxemia and undernutrition associated with IUGR do not affect elastin synthesis and deposition in fetal lungs; alterations in lung structure following IUGR must have other causes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Lung ResearchSame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207