MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040996535 · doi:10.1063/1.1337859

V 3 : Structure and vibrations from density functional theory, Franck–Condon factors, and the pulsed-field ionization zero-electron-kinetic energy spectrum

2001· article· en· W2040996535 on OpenAlexaff
Patrizia Calaminici, Andreas M. Köster, Tucker Carrington, Pierre–Nicholas Roy, Nino Russo, Dennis R. Salahub

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround stateAtomic physicsChemistryDensity functional theoryIonization energyIonizationKinetic energyEquilateral triangleMolecular physicsIonPhysicsComputational chemistryQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Density functional calculations of neutral and cationic vanadium trimers are presented. The all-electron calculations employed a gradient-corrected exchange-correlation functional and a newly developed vanadium basis set optimized for gradient-corrected density functional calculations. For both neutral and charged systems, different isomers were studied in order to determine the lowest energy structures. A vibrational analysis was performed in order to characterize these isomers. We found an equilateral triangle A1′2 ground state for V3 and an equilateral triangle A2′3 ground state for V3+. The experimental pulsed-field ionization zero-electron-kinetic energy spectrum was simulated by calculating multidimensional Franck–Condon factors, using the geometries and harmonic frequencies of the calculated minima of V3 and V3+. The excellent agreement between the experimental and theoretical spectra allows the unequivocal determination of the ground state structure of V3. This work provides a final answer to the controversy in the literature about the ground state structure of V3 and yields deeper insight into the electronic structure of the neutral and cationic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207