Impairment of Cognitive Function Reported by Patients Suffering from Carcinoid Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carcinoid syndrome (CS) is characterized by symptoms of diarrhea, flushing, bronchospasm, and valvular heart disease. It has been our impression that patients with CS also exhibit features of cognitive impairment. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate if symptoms of cognitive impairment were reported by patients with CS. METHODS: Patients with proven CS completed a 38-question multiple-ability self-report questionnaire (MASQ) to assess symptoms in five cognitive domains: language skills, attention/concentration (A/C), visual-perceptual function, visual memory, and verbal memory. Patients subsequently underwent neurocognitive assessment using a battery of six standardized tests. Results of the MASQ and the cognitive test were compared to published results for healthy individuals. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with CS were studied. MASQ symptom scores were higher than published norms in all five cognitive domains. Patients reported greatest difficulty with verbal memory (mean +/- SD = 2.74 +/- 0.5), followed by A/C (2.41 +/- 0.65), language (2.31 +/- 0.55), visual memory (2.30 +/- 0.65), and visual-perceptual function (2.17 +/- 0.59). In contrast, neurocognitive tests for verbal memory immediate recall, visual memory, language, and executive function were within the normal range. CS patients, however, scored lower than expected in tests of verbal memory delayed recall and visual-perceptual function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CS report high levels of symptoms of impairment in all cognitive domains; however, on formal neurocognitive testing, patients scored lower than expected only in tests of verbal memory delayed recall and visual-perceptual function. These findings appear to confirm our clinical impression that cognitive impairment may be an additional feature of CS. Further studies are needed to confirm and elucidate the cause of this cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".