MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041026645 · doi:10.1109/icbbe.2010.5516066

Seasonal Simulation of Ozone by Air Quality Model-CMAQ in the Great Lakes

2010· article· en· W2041026645 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shuangchen Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of WaterlooPennsylvania State UniversityU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsCMAQOzoneAir quality indexEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyClimatologyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development and evaluation of a seasonal air quality model for ozone by the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for the summer of 2001 in the Great Lakes in this paper are described. The CMAQ simulated ozone and the Air Quality System (AQS) observed values are compared utilizing hourly ozone values. Normalized Mean Bias (NMB) and Normalized Mean Error (NME) as statistical metrics are used for evaluation the simulation performance. Ozone prediction performance is good, with the 5 sites for summer season having NMB values within ±15% and NME values less than 35%. The model tends to underestimate ozone concentration with average NMB -11.65%. Simulation results reflect the relationship between O3 formation and its precursors well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical EngineeringSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207