Tegmental pedunculopontine glutamate and GABA-B synapses mediate morphine reward.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus (TPP) of the midbrain is critical in mediating the acute rewarding effects of opiates. However, the circuitry and neurochemistry underlying this effect has not been determined. Here we identify TPP receptors and cell types involved in systemic morphine reward and suggest an anatomical and neurochemical model for reward in the TPP. Simple hypothetical anatomical models for serial cell arrangements and receptors in the TPP were proposed and predictions of behavioral outcome (reward or no reward) then were made, based on the administration of agonists and antagonists directly into the TPP of rats. We report that TPP-administered NMDA produced rewarding effects, although GABA agonists and antagonists had no motivational effects on their own. However, the NMDA receptor antagonist AP-7 and the GABA-B receptor antagonist saclofen, while having no motivational effects on their own, blocked systemic morphine reward as measured by conditioned place preference. These results provide positive evidence for GABA-B and glutamate synapses in the TPP, which mediates systemic morphine reward and suggest that a serial pathway for morphine reward in the TPP is unlikely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".