La participation politique au prisme de l’ethnicité : étude du discours des candidats issus de l’immigration maghrébine lors d’une échéance électorale en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lors des dernières élections françaises de 2004, la question de la place et du rôle des candidats d’origine maghrébine a été un enjeu controversé, relançant le débat sur le modèle universaliste français. Dans ce contexte, nous nous sommes interrogée sur l’importance accordée à l’ethnicité par les candidats d’origine maghrébine dans leur discours, à travers l’étude de leurs professions de foi et la réalisation d’entretiens. Trois types d’attitudes envers l’ethnicité ont ainsi été observés. Si la majorité des candidats ne mentionne aucun élément d’ordre ethnique, certains l’utilisent ponctuellement – soit pour se présenter, soit pour désigner une partie de la population française – tandis que seule une force autonome marginale (Union française pour la cohésion nationale - UFCN) fait de la situation des gens d’origine maghrébine une de ses préoccupations centrales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".