Use of Amine/PHPA System To Drill High Reactive Shales in the Orito Field in Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The use of water based fluids replacing oil based drilling fluids has been increasingly being applied in the Petroleum Industry in order to mainly accomplish environmental legislation. A challenge when using water based drilling fluids in highly reactive shales is to overcome problems such as wellbore instability, torque and drag and environmental requirements. This was the case in the Orito oil field in Colombia. The Orito field is located to the south of the country and has been operated by Petrominerales Colombia Ltd. During years of exploitation, the Orito wells were drilled with oil base muds in order to address wellbore instability problems related to the highly reactive shales of the Villeta formation, which is drilled in the 311 mm (12 ¼") hole and is about 300 m (1000 ft) long. Some years ago, different water based mud systems have been used in the area; however, it has not achieved the high performance expected by the operator to successfully drill the troublesome Villeta formation. Thus, in order to drill the two last development wells in the Orito field, it was proposed that an Amine/PHPA system to be evaluated. The Amine/PHPA system has been developed by Q'Max Solutions in Canada and has also been used in Ecuador with very good results. According to own experiences in the field, the Amine/PHPA system was formulated to achieve the right concentration of each mud product to satisfy the necessity of a system that provides at the same time good inhibition, adequate rheology properties and lubricantion during the angle build section. Capillary Suction Test (CST) were carried out to determine the right concentration of amine and PHPA to provide inhibition for the highly reactive Villeta shales. Historical cases of hydraulics and operational performance were studied to find out xanthan gum concentrations to reach adequate yield point values that secure hole cleaning during the most critical deviated section of the interval and lubricant concentration was also determined to reduce torque and drag in the water based system. This paper is intended to present the performance of the Amine/PHPA system and environmental achievements in an environmentally sensitive area. Laboratory and field data obtained during the project is also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".