Experimental Study on Natural Convection in an Asymmetrically Heated Inclined Channel With Radiation Exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heat transfer in an asymmetrically heated, inclined channel by natural convection and radiation exchange was experimentally investigated. Experiments were conducted on channels with small inclination angle (to horizontal) ranging from 18° to 30° and a wall surface emissivity of 0.29 to 0.95. The channel length/space ratio was between 44 and 220. In each test, a uniform heat flux was applied along the top wall of the channel, while the bottom wall was thermally insulated. Temperature profiles along both the top and bottom walls of the channel were recorded under different heat flux and channel length/space ratios. The dependency of maximum wall temperature and heat transfer on the channel spacing and surface emissivity was explored. As a result of this work, correlations of local and average Nusselt number, with modified channel Rayleigh number, were determined and proposed for channels at inclination angle of around 18° and surface emissivities of around 0.95. The proposed correlation will be valid for modified-Rayleigh number in the range of 10 < Ra” < 5.6 × 104 at asymmetric heat flux boundary conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".