MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041075843 · doi:10.1109/rose.2012.6402624

Rigorous movement of convex polygons on a path using multiple robots

2012· article· en· W2041075843 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPath (computing)RobotObject (grammar)Orientation (vector space)Computer scienceMotion planningTask (project management)Boundary (topology)Computer visionRegular polygonTrajectoryPoint (geometry)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometryEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes an approach for pushing a convex polygonal object with rigor using multiple robots, along a desired rectilinear path in a two-dimensional polygonal environment. The goal is to rigorously push the object along the path while preserving its orientation and alignment, as well as precisely rotating it about its center when necessary. A path planning algorithm is presented which computes a shortest-path approximation between two points in the environment. In general, the path requires both translations and rotations of the object along the way. Robots are arranged into three groups, where each group is assigned a task of either pushing the object towards its goal or adjusting it as it veers off from the desired path. Each robot is computationally simple in that it merely moves towards a target point somewhere on the boundary of the object. As the robots move towards these target points, they cooperatively push the object with no interaction between one another. The robots rely on only three parameters to push the object: the orientation of the object, the current target point and the task they are required to perform. The target points are provided by a global control & monitoring system that monitors the progress and stability of the robots as they push the object along the path, providing direction to the robots in terms of tasks such as pushing, rotating, re-alignment, re-orientation or repositioning commands. We verified our algorithm with a number of simulations that address the usefulness of the solution as well as the effects that an increase in the number of robots will have on the runtime and the data communication load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207