MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041124025 · doi:10.1115/1.4003988

Oxidized Graphite Nanoplatelets as an Improved Filler for Thermally Conducting Epoxy-Matrix Composites

2011· article· en· W2041124025 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobo Sun, Aiping Yu, Palanisamy Ramesh, Elena Bekyarova, Mikhail E. Itkis, Robert C. Haddon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronic Packaging · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraphiteMaterials scienceComposite materialEpoxyExfoliation jointCarbon nanotubePolymerRaman spectroscopySurface modificationFourier transform infrared spectroscopyNanocompositeFiller (materials)GrapheneChemical engineeringNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a 40% improvement of the thermal conductivity of graphite nanoplatelets–epoxy composites by chemical functionalization of graphite nanoplatelets utilizing nitric acid treatment, which also serves to enhance the spreadability of the material. FTIR and Raman spectroscopy confirmed the presence of a variety of oxygen functional groups at the edges and basal plane of the functionalized graphite nanoplatelets, which contributed to improved interaction with the polymer matrix. A comparative statistical analysis of the particle size distributions in pristine and functionalized graphite nanoplatelets based on scanning electron microscopy showed an increasing degree of exfoliation of the functionalized material. We compare the performance of the functionalized graphite nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes as fillers in the polymer matrix and discuss the prospects for utilization of graphite nanoplatelets-based thermal interface materials in electronic packaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electronic PackagingSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207