MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041127497 · doi:10.1002/rcm.2992

Analysis of effect of casein phosphopeptides on zinc binding using mass spectrometry

2007· article· en· W2041127497 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaxi Wang, Kirk Green, Graham A. McGibbon, Brian E. McCarry

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhosphopeptidePeptidePhosphorylationMass spectrometryElectrospray ionizationZincProtein mass spectrometryChromatographyCaseinElectrosprayFragmentation (computing)BiochemistryBiophysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorylation is one of the key events in signal transduction and zinc plays an important catalytic and/or structural role in many biological systems. The binding of Zn to a phosphopeptide will alter the physiological functions of a peptide. The binding of casein phosphopeptides (CPPs) to Zn has been analyzed using nanospray mass spectrometry. Electrospray ionization (ESI) spectra of peptides produced by tryptic digestion of alpha-casein incubated with Zn show both free and Zn-bound phosphopeptides. The interaction of CPPs and the corresponding dephosphorylated peptides with zinc is compared. This study demonstrates that the phosphorylation state of a peptide dramatically affects Zn binding, with the decrease in Zn-bound forms of peptide paralleling the decrease in phosphorylation as casein is chemically dephosphorylated, although, in some cases, a small amount of residual Zn-binding capacity remains in the completely dephosphorylated peptide. The observed fragmentation patterns of the Zn-bound CPPs support the thesis that nonphosphorylated residues are involved in the metal binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRapid Communications in Mass SpectrometrySame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207