MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041145961 · doi:10.1109/map.2013.6645194

Construction of Green's Functions for Multilayered Media Using Signal-Flow Graphs [Education Column]

2013· article· en· W2041145961 on OpenAlexaff
Armin Parsa, Robert Paknys, Christophe Caloz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityPolytechnique MontréalRutter (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignal-flow graphFlow (mathematics)SIGNAL (programming language)Observer (physics)MathematicsMathematical analysisComputer sciencePhysicsGeometryEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The utilization of signal-flow graphs is demonstrated as a simple and intuitive approach for constructing Green's functions for multilayered media. The branches of the signal-flow graphs represent wave transmission or reflection coefficients in or between the different layers, while their nodes correspond to layer interfaces, the source and the observer points. First, the flow-graph derivation of the Green's function is presented for the one-dimensional case of a plane wave produced by a uniform electric-current-sheet source normally incident on a two-layered medium. The derivation is next generalized to the case of multilayered media. The problem is solved for the case where both the excitation and the observation points are inside the first-layer medium. Finally, the one-dimensional case is then extended to higher dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Propagation MagazineSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207