MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041150717 · doi:10.1109/saci.2013.6608950

2-DOF control solutions for an electric drive system under continuously variable conditions

2013· article· en· W2041150717 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra-Iulia Szedlak-Stinean, Ștefan Preitl, Radu‐Emil Precup, Claudia‐Adina Bojan‐Dragos, Emil M. Petriu, Mircea‐Bogdan Rădac

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Variable (mathematics)MechatronicsControl engineeringControl systemContext (archaeology)Process (computing)InertiaMoment of inertiaPID controllerMoment (physics)Control variableProcess controlComputer scienceAutomatic controlVariable structure controlEngineeringControl (management)Temperature controlMathematicsSliding mode controlNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper deals with control solutions for an electric drive system where the reference and the load disturbance are continuously variable and the plant has variable parameters. The main variable parameter of the process is the moment of inertia in the context of a system that corresponds to laboratory equipment. Using a detailed mathematical model of the process and the particular features of the drive system, the paper proposes variable control structures with switching between three or more control algorithms. This solution is preferred instead of a continuously parameter adaptation due to its simplicity in adaptation to the representative operating points. The control design results are focused on development of two-degree-of-freedom PID control solutions. The control solutions are applied in case studies based on digital simulation but, considering fixed values of the process parameters, they can be easily verified on laboratory equipment [1]. The proposed control solutions have a large applicability in the field of mechatronics systems, where such applications with variable moment of inertia and control system inputs are always present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl Systems in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207