Seismic Performance of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames in Multistory Buildings with Mass Irregularity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of mass irregularity on building seismic response is examined for an eight-story concentrically braced steel frame with different setback configurations resulting in sudden reductions in plan dimensions and seismic weight along the height of the structure. Three locations of mass discontinuity were considered (25, 50, and 75% of the building height), together with two ratios of seismic weight (200 and 300%). A reference regular structure was also considered for comparison. The design of each structure was performed according to the proposed 2005 National Building Code of Canada NBCC provisions using two analysis methods: The equivalent static force procedure and the response spectrum analysis method. Although severe, the mass irregularity conditions considered in this study were found to have a limited negative impact on the seismic performance of the structures designed with the static analysis method. The performance of irregular structures exhibiting lower performance could be improved by using the dynamic analysis method in design, but not to the level achieved by the reference regular structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it