A CD study of uncoupling protein-1 and its transmembrane and matrix-loop domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conformations of the prototypic UCP-1 (uncoupling protein-1) and its TM (transmembrane) and ML (matrix-loop) domains were studied by CD spectroscopy. Recombinant, untagged mouse UCP-1 and a hexahistidine-tagged version of the protein were obtained in high purity following their overexpression in Escherichia coli. The TM and ML domains of hamster UCP-1 were chemically synthesized. Conformations of both recombinant UCP-1 proteins were dominantly helical (40-50%) in digitonin micelles. Binding of the purine nucleotides GDP and GTP to UCP-1, detected in the near-UV CD region, supported the existence of the functional form of the protein in digitonin micelles. All individual TM and ML peptides, except the third ML domain, adopted helical structures in aqueous trifluoroethanol, which implies that, in addition to six TM segments, at least two of the ML domains of the UCP-1 can form helical structures in membrane interface regions. TM and ML domains interacted with vesicles composed of the main phospholipids of the inner membrane of mitochondria, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine and cardiolipin, to adopt dominantly beta- and/or unordered conformations. Mixtures of UCP-1 peptide domains spontaneously associated in aqueous, phospholipid vesicles and digitonin micelle environments to form ordered conformations, which exhibited common features with the conformations of the full-length proteins. Thermal denaturations of UCP-1 and its nine-peptide-domain assembly in digitonin were co-operative but not reversible. Assembly of six TM domains in lipid bilayers formed ion-conducting units with possible helical bundle conformations. Consequently, covalent connection between peptide domains, tight domain interactions and TM potential are essential for the formation of the functional conformation of UCP-1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".