Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rectangular and circular waveguide evanescent‐mode filters with polarization‐preserving properties are presented. The filters are formed by inserting quadruple‐ridged resonators in a square or circular waveguide operated below cutoff. They are especially suited in applications requiring short and compact components. The numerical technique that facilitates eigenvalue and scattering parameter computations is verified against measurements. Basic design considerations are discussed, and structural dimensions are provided for two 9.5 GHz filters with 500 MHz bandwidth. Performances are validated by independent and commercially available electromagnetic software packages. Sensitivity issues for fabrication are addressed by a tolerance analysis. Fabrication accuracy is acceptable for operation in dual vertical and horizontal polarizations but is considerably more stringent for circularly polarized applications. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 53:1435–1439, 2011; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.26016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".