Northern Cordilleran terranes and their interactions through time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the 25 years since the first application of the terrane concept to the North American Cordillera and the introduction of the term “suspect,” a pattern of interterrane stratigraphic and intrusive linkages and shared isotopic and faunal elements has emerged. Far from being restricted to late, postamalgamation overlaps, these linkages can be as old as the oldest rocks within the terranes. In the Canadian Cordillera, these linkages give a coherent sense to terranes that otherwise might appear to be a collection of isolated and unrelated fragments. Such observed linkages effectively eliminate some of the paleogeographic uncertainties that were previously inferred between adjacent terranes (although not necessarily with respect to the Laurentian continent) and highlight their common history. In light of these relationships, it is now possible to interpret terranes of the Canadian Cordillera in terms of shared geodynamic scenarios, such as repeated arc superposition on older arcs and/or basement and coexisting arc system components. A primary result of this analysis is that the Intermontane terranes represent one interrelated set of arcs, marginal seas, and continental fragments that once formed a Paleozoic to early Mesozoic fringe to North America, the peri-Laurentian realm. By contrast, the Insular terranes, along with the Farewell and Arctic-Alaska terranes, include crustal fragments that originated from separate sites within the Arctic realm in Paleozoic time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".