MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041247413 · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.04.001

Ottawa panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on therapeutic massage for neck pain

2012· review· en· W2041247413 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lucie Brosseau, George A. Wells, Peter Tugwell, Lynn Casimiro, М. Л. Новиков, Laurianne Loew, Danijel Sredic, Amélie Gravelle, Kevin Hua, Daniel Kresic, Ana Lakic, Gabrielle Ménard, Pascale Côté, Ghislain Leblanc, Mathieu Sonier, Alexandre Cloutier, Jessica McEwan, Stéphane Poitras, Andrea D Furlan, Anita Gross, Trish Dryden, Ron Muckenheim, Raynald Côté, Véronique Paré, Alexandre Rouhani, Guillaume Léonard, Hillel M. Finestone, Lucie Laferrière, Simon Dagenais, Gino De Angelis, Courtney Cohoon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Armed ForcesÉlisabeth Bruyère HospitalCentennial CollegeOttawa HospitalInstitute for Work & HealthInstitute of Population and Public HealthUniversité de SherbrookeMcMaster UniversityMontfort HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMassageMedicinePhysical therapyGuidelineNeck painGrading (engineering)Clinical PracticeManual therapyPsychological interventionChronic painRange of motionAlternative medicineNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.016
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0100.003
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.262
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bodywork and Movement TherapiesSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207