MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041249925 · doi:10.7224/1537-2073-3.2.4

The Saint, the King's Grandson, the Poet, and the Victorian Writer: Instances of MS When the Disease Did Not Have a Name

2001· article· en· W2041249925 on OpenAlexaff
Jock Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of MS Care · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTMedicineContext (archaeology)Multiple sclerosisDiseaseClassicsPsychiatryArt historyHistoryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Several historical figures experienced many of the manifestations of what we now call multiple sclerosis (MS). Descriptions of their symptoms and the medical treatments of the day are discussed. While modern clinicians may argue whether these people had MS, presumed MS, or another condition entirely, the case histories of Lidwina of Schiedam, Margaret Davis of Myddle, William Brown, Sir Augustus D'Esté, Heinrich Heine, Allan Stephenson, and Margaret Gatty provide an intriguing glimpse into the history of MS, medical treatment, and the social context of neurologic illness in previous centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.029
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of MS CareSame topicNeurology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207