MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041254107 · doi:10.1353/bhs.0.0085

<i>Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and Native Religions in the Colonial Americas 1492-1700</i> (review)

2009· article· en· W2041254107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Hispanic Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristianityColonialismIndigenousMAGIC (telescope)HistoryOrder (exchange)ClassicsReligious studiesAnthropologyPhilosophySociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and Native Religions in the Colonial Americas 1492-1700 Claire Brewster Nicholas Griffiths , Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and Native Religions in the Colonial Americas 1492–1700. Great Britain: Lulu.com2006. 425 pp. ISBN 978-1-84753-171-1. Sacred Dialogues is a welcome addition to studies of religion in the Americas. In his introduction Nicholas Griffiths states that his intention is 'to provide an accessible synthesis' of work on this topic that has been largely published during the last 30 years (i). [End Page 717] While this book may not present new findings, it certainly offers a very useful synthesis, particularly as it covers both North and South America. It is organized into geographical sections that offer detailed insights into how Christianity was introduced, adapted and assimilated by indigenous communities in Spanish America, North America and Canada. In drawing together existing studies, Griffiths shows how the early missionaries diffused the Word by using pre-Columbian languages and the existing systems of belief. He reveals that in the process 'Christian concepts' became situated 'within a native moral framework' (32). Interesting case studies are included to illustrate precisely how this happened; these 'ripping yarns' help to make the book more accessible and a good read. In some areas of Spanish America missionaries deliberately used 'Christian magic' to encourage conversion (208); hence, as Griffiths points out, 'Christianity became indigenized almost without anybody noticing' (210). In parts of North America more practical means were used as bait: 'Most Hurons became Christians in order to obtain guns and better trading relations, or to join dead relatives in Heaven' (226). The unintentional role played by European diseases in assisting conversion is emphasized. In certain regions, the failure of traditional medicine and the inability of the shamans to cure previously unknown viruses led many to turn to the Christian faith. In others, however, Native Americans directly attributed the spread of disease to the Jesuit missionaries. And as Griffiths underlines, the Jesuits did indeed assist epidemics, albeit unintentionally, by transmitting germs on their clothes and shoes (265). Griffiths notes that a major difference in the evangelization of the Americas was that the spreading of Christianity was 'peripheral' for French and English colonists, whereas it was 'essential' to Spanish ambitions (347). The Spaniards' mission was politically as well as religiously driven: in colonial Spanish America the indigenous were discouraged from holding positions of responsibility within the Church, in order to maintain their subordinate position and to regulate the manner in which Christianity was spread. This was not the case in North America; using the work of Harold Van Lonkhuyen and James Axtell, Griffiths draws attention to a proliferation of Native American preachers, teachers and catechists on the Natick reserve, Massachusetts (311). It was a similar story in Martha's Vineyard, in which a culture developed that was 'simultaneously Christian and Indian' (340). In conclusion, Griffiths determines that 'pre-colonial native religion was not incompatible with Christian beliefs and practices' and that the 'two religions could be practiced together at different levels without explosive tension' (357). The manner in which he demonstrates that this was the case throughout the Americas is the great strength of the book. Yet given its broad geographical scope, and its intention to be an accessible study, a glossary would have been a useful addition. It is also disappointing that the term 'Indian' appears so often in the text. Griffiths' defence is that 'scholarly custom permits' its usage (359), but surely scholars can correct customs, as well as follow them. Sacred Dialogues is otherwise very well written, argued and presented and is certain to be popular with scholars and students interested in this topic. Claire Brewster Newcastle University Copyright © 2009 Liverpool University Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it