MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2041254107 · doi:10.1353/bhs.0.0085

<i>Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and Native Religions in the Colonial Americas 1492-1700</i> (review)

2009· article· en· W2041254107 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Brewster

Notice bibliographique

RevueBulletin of Hispanic Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLatin American history and culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChristianityColonialismIndigenousMAGIC (telescope)HistoryOrder (exchange)ClassicsReligious studiesAnthropologyPhilosophySociologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and Native Religions in the Colonial Americas 1492-1700 Claire Brewster Nicholas Griffiths , Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and Native Religions in the Colonial Americas 1492–1700. Great Britain: Lulu.com2006. 425 pp. ISBN 978-1-84753-171-1. Sacred Dialogues is a welcome addition to studies of religion in the Americas. In his introduction Nicholas Griffiths states that his intention is 'to provide an accessible synthesis' of work on this topic that has been largely published during the last 30 years (i). [End Page 717] While this book may not present new findings, it certainly offers a very useful synthesis, particularly as it covers both North and South America. It is organized into geographical sections that offer detailed insights into how Christianity was introduced, adapted and assimilated by indigenous communities in Spanish America, North America and Canada. In drawing together existing studies, Griffiths shows how the early missionaries diffused the Word by using pre-Columbian languages and the existing systems of belief. He reveals that in the process 'Christian concepts' became situated 'within a native moral framework' (32). Interesting case studies are included to illustrate precisely how this happened; these 'ripping yarns' help to make the book more accessible and a good read. In some areas of Spanish America missionaries deliberately used 'Christian magic' to encourage conversion (208); hence, as Griffiths points out, 'Christianity became indigenized almost without anybody noticing' (210). In parts of North America more practical means were used as bait: 'Most Hurons became Christians in order to obtain guns and better trading relations, or to join dead relatives in Heaven' (226). The unintentional role played by European diseases in assisting conversion is emphasized. In certain regions, the failure of traditional medicine and the inability of the shamans to cure previously unknown viruses led many to turn to the Christian faith. In others, however, Native Americans directly attributed the spread of disease to the Jesuit missionaries. And as Griffiths underlines, the Jesuits did indeed assist epidemics, albeit unintentionally, by transmitting germs on their clothes and shoes (265). Griffiths notes that a major difference in the evangelization of the Americas was that the spreading of Christianity was 'peripheral' for French and English colonists, whereas it was 'essential' to Spanish ambitions (347). The Spaniards' mission was politically as well as religiously driven: in colonial Spanish America the indigenous were discouraged from holding positions of responsibility within the Church, in order to maintain their subordinate position and to regulate the manner in which Christianity was spread. This was not the case in North America; using the work of Harold Van Lonkhuyen and James Axtell, Griffiths draws attention to a proliferation of Native American preachers, teachers and catechists on the Natick reserve, Massachusetts (311). It was a similar story in Martha's Vineyard, in which a culture developed that was 'simultaneously Christian and Indian' (340). In conclusion, Griffiths determines that 'pre-colonial native religion was not incompatible with Christian beliefs and practices' and that the 'two religions could be practiced together at different levels without explosive tension' (357). The manner in which he demonstrates that this was the case throughout the Americas is the great strength of the book. Yet given its broad geographical scope, and its intention to be an accessible study, a glossary would have been a useful addition. It is also disappointing that the term 'Indian' appears so often in the text. Griffiths' defence is that 'scholarly custom permits' its usage (359), but surely scholars can correct customs, as well as follow them. Sacred Dialogues is otherwise very well written, argued and presented and is certain to be popular with scholars and students interested in this topic. Claire Brewster Newcastle University Copyright © 2009 Liverpool University Press

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0320,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBulletin of Hispanic StudiesMême sujetLatin American history and cultureTravaux en français237 207