MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041295785 · doi:10.1142/s021827180000044x

A HAMILTONIAN TREATMENT OF FIVE-DIMENSIONAL KALUZA–KLEIN GRAVITY

2000· article· en· W2041295785 on OpenAlexaff
W. N. Sajko

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics D · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHamiltonian (control theory)Mathematical physicsScalar fieldGravitationSchwarzschild metricKaluza–Klein theoryGravitational fieldGeneral relativityScalar (mathematics)Classical mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We give a Hamiltonian treatment of 5D vacuum Kaluza–Klein theory that is unrestricted in the extra coordinate dependence. When the extra coordinate dependence is removed from the 5D metric we recover the Hamiltonian for gravity and electromagetism nonminimally coupled to a scalar field. The energies of 5D uncharged and charged soliton solutions are calculated via the Hamiltonian and are identified with the total mass. The expressions for the total mass are shown to agree with the sum of scalar and gravitational masses calculated from the scalar-tensor induced matter in 4D. A semi-classical derivation of the temperature for the uncharged solitons is calculated and it is shown that the only nontrivial member of the 5D class is the 4D Schwarzschild solution trivially embedded in 5D, and therefore the entropy obeys the one-quarter area law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics DSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207