Geotechnical characteristics of large rapid rock slides
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the analysis of 51 case studies of large rapid rock slides, for a landslide to travel rapidly after failure there has to be a significant loss of strength on the basal surface of rupture, lateral margins, and (or) internally within the slide mass, or the factor of safety has to be maintained below 1.0 after failure by high groundwater pressures. Internally sheared compound slides and translational slides may all travel rapidly depending on their detailed geotechnical and geometric characteristics. The characteristics of these landslides that suggest an increased likelihood of rapid failure have been identified. All the rapid rock slides examined in this study involved relatively high-strength rock masses. Most cases were considered to be first-time landslides, largely involving brittleness on the basal rupture surface. However, there were some cases considered to be reactivated or active landslides on pre-sheared rupture surfaces. For this latter group, the loss of strength leading to rapid landsliding was associated with brittle internal deformation or lateral margins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it