MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041354713 · doi:10.1109/ichqp.2010.5625462

Control of three phase grid connected photovoltaic power systems

2010· article· en· W2041354713 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingPhotovoltaic systemInterfacingGrid-connected photovoltaic power systemTransformerGridComputer scienceInverterElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringPower optimizerPower conditionerEngineeringAC powerVoltageComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a control methodology for interfacing medium and large photovoltaic (PV) arrays to the power system distribution grid. First, the structure of the PV system in grid-connected mode is introduced. It consists of a PV array in addition to a power conditioning system for grid interfacing purposes. The power conditioning system is composed of a DC-DC boost converter, followed by a current controlled Voltage Source Inverter (VSI). The system was controlled to inject a clean sinusoidal current into the grid. Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) and PV cell modeling will be discussed as well. After that, simulation results of the system using MATLAB SIMULINK are presented. Finally, a case study was conducted to examine the effect of the interfacing transformer topology on the system during fault conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it