MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041382836 · doi:10.1049/iet-com:20080210

Partial regularisation approach for detection problems in underdetermined linear systems

2009· article· en· W2041382836 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao-Wen Chang, Xiaohua Yang, Tho Le‐Ngoc, Peng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderdetermined systemOverdetermined systemKarush–Kuhn–Tucker conditionsInteger (computer science)MathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmDecoding methodsLeast-squares function approximationMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The maximum likelihood detection problem in many underdetermined linear communications systems can be described as an underdetermined integer least squares (ILS) problem. To solve it efficiently, a partial regularisation approach is proposed. The original underdetermined ILS problem is first transformed to an equivalent overdetermined ILS problem by using part of the transmit vector to do the regularisation. Then the overdetermined ILS problem is solved by conventional sphere decoding algorithms. Simulation results indicate that this approach can be much more efficient than other approaches for any square constellation higher than 4QAM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207