Catalytic Ammonia Synthesis over Mo Nitride/ZSM‐5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Molybdenum nitride species in HZSM‐5 are prepared by the reaction of ammonia with MoOx, which is pre‐exchanged into the channel of HZSM‐5. Both the processes of solid exchange of molybdenum oxide with the zeolite and the ammonia reaction are monitored by mass spectrometry. The Mo/N ratio of the MoNx species in the Mo nitride/HZSM‐5 is close to 2, as measured by temperature‐programmed oxidation. The MoNx species are more stable than bulk Mo2N against oxidation, due to the interaction between the molybdenum nitride species and the charged zeolite framework. The MoNx species, of which the dispersion is found to be greater than 90 %, are very active in ammonia synthesis and the catalytic activity is much more stable than that of bulk Mo2N. The reaction pressure is much more favorable to ammonia formation on the MoNx/ZSM‐5 catalyst than on bulk Mo2N. The interaction of nitrogen molecules with the inner electric field of the zeolite, at an equivalent pressure, enhances the reaction of ammonia synthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".