MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041406170 · doi:10.1139/x00-158

The impacts of broadcast burning after clear-cutting on the diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with hybrid spruce seedlings in central British Columbia

2001· article· en· W2041406170 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Karen Mah, Linda E. Tackaberry, Keith N. Egger, Hugues B. Massicotte

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySeedlingBotanyEctomycorrhizaHorticultureMycorrhizaSymbiosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Morphological and molecular (polymerase chain reaction – restriction fragment length polymorphism) methods were used to assess ectomycorrhiza (ECM) diversity in naturally regenerating and planted Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm. × Picea glauca (Moench) Voss seedlings in two recently clear-cut sites, two clear-cut and broadcast burned sites, and two mature forests (>100 years) in central British Columbia. Based on 24 characterized ECM, burning did not affect overall diversity (Shannon, Simpson, Shannon evenness, and Margalef indices). However, the occurrence and relative abundance of some ECM morphotypes varied significantly. Hebeloma and a Russulaceae type 1 were more abundant and Cenococcum was less abundant in planted seedlings from cut-burned sites compared with those from clear-cut sites. E-strain, MRA, and Amphinema were more abundant in planted seedlings from both cut-burned and clear-cut sites compared with naturally regenerating seedlings from mature sites. ECM diversity of regenerating seedlings was significantly greater in mature forests compared with clear-cut sites and was greater in planted seedlings than naturally regenerating seedlings in clear-cut sites. Molecular analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region of the nuclear-encoded ribosomal RNA gene repeat showed no significant differences among treatments or seedling type. Twenty-two genotypes were identified from eight common morphotypes: Cenococcum (one), Thelephora (two), E-strain, Tuber, Hebeloma, and Russulaceae type 1 (three each), MRA (four), and Amphinema (six). Hebeloma genotypes matched three for Amphinema; genotypes from unidentified lightly colonized tips matched those for E-strain, MRA, and Amphinema-Hebeloma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207