MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041413176 · doi:10.3115/1073445.1073470

Language and task independent text categorization with simple language models

2003· article· en· W2041413176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAuthorship Attribution and Profiling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNatural language processingCategorizationArtificial intelligenceTask (project management)Language identificationSimple (philosophy)Language modelVariety (cybernetics)Independence (probability theory)Selection (genetic algorithm)Identification (biology)Feature (linguistics)Character (mathematics)Text categorizationFeature selectionNatural languageLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simple method for language independent and task independent text categorization learning, based on character-level n-gram language models. Our approach uses simple information theoretic principles and achieves effective performance across a variety of languages and tasks without requiring feature selection or extensive pre-processing. To demonstrate the language and task independence of the proposed technique, we present experimental results on several languages---Greek, English, Chinese and Japanese---in several text categorization problems---language identification, authorship attribution, text genre classification, and topic detection. Our experimental results show that the simple approach achieves state of the art performance in each case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations112
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingFrench-language works237,207