MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041420484 · doi:10.7202/014155ar

Les parcours du marronnage dans l’histoire haïtienne

2007· article· fr· W2041420484 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dimitri Béchacq

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnologies · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En s’appuyant sur de nombreuses sources imprimées et orales, l’auteur examine dans cet article les usages sociaux et politiques du phénomène du marronnage, terme qui désignait la fuite des esclaves hors du système des plantations dans la colonie française de Saint-Domingue. Après 1804, date qui consacre la révolte des esclaves commencée en 1791, les pratiques coercitives du nouvel État haïtien favorisèrent la poursuite de stratégies de résistance et orientèrent la construction d’une histoire officielle haïtienne. Ces rapports de domination nourrirent un registre de mémoires plurielles dont les traces marquent jusqu’à aujourd’hui les diverses réinterprétations publiques du marronnage, de la rumeur populaire aux commémorations officielles. Avec l’exemple de la statue du Marron Inconnu, l’examen du statut changeant du marronnage dans l’histoire haïtienne ainsi que l’analyse des différents usages langagiers de ce terme, permettent d’éclairer la longévité et la diversité des valeurs véhiculées par la figure du marron, entre héroïsme et anti-modèle social. Cette dichotomie illustre la présence massive et diffuse de l’histoire dans le paysage social et politique haïtien, et elle véhicule le poids des catégorisations sociales et raciales héritées de la période esclavagiste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnologiesSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207