Activation of Na+/H+ Exchanger-directed Protein Kinases in the Ischemic and Ischemic-reperfused Rat Myocardium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The activity of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger has been implicated as an important contributing factor in damage to the myocardium that occurs during ischemia and reperfusion. We examined regulation of the protein in ischemic and reperfused isolated hearts and isolated ventricular myocytes. In isolated myocytes, extracellular signal-regulated kinases were important in regulating activity of the exchanger after recovery from ischemia. Ischemia followed by reperfusion caused a strong inhibitory effect on NHE1 activity that abated with continued reperfusion. Four major protein kinases of size 90, 55, 44, and 40 kDa phosphorylated the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger. The Na(+)/H(+) exchanger-directed kinases demonstrated dramatic increases in activity of 2-10-fold that was induced by 3 different models of ischemia and reperfusion in intact hearts and isolated myocytes. p90(rsk) was identified as the 90-kDa protein kinase activated by ischemia and reperfusion while ERK1/2 was identified as accounting for some of the 44-kDa protein kinase phosphorylating the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger. The results demonstrate that MAPK-dependent pathways including p90(rsk) and ERK1/2 and are important in regulating the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger and show their dramatic increase in activity toward the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger during ischemia and reperfusion of the myocardium. They also show that ischemia followed by reperfusion have important inhibitory effects on Na(+)/H(+) exchanger activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".