MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041458629 · doi:10.1109/isqed.2008.4479684

Tutorial 1: The Promise of High-k/Metal Gates-From Electronic Transport Phenomena to Emerging Device/Circuit Applications

2008· article· en· W2041458629 on OpenAlexaff
K. Maitra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSTransistorLogic gateMetal gateElectrical engineeringScalabilityComputer scienceMaterials scienceReliability (semiconductor)Electronic circuitNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringEngineering physicsPhysicsEngineeringGate oxideVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. Recent advancements of gate stack engineering have enabled the introduction of high-k/metal gates into mainstream CMOS device applications for 45 nm and beyond technology space. In this talk, we take a critical look back into the key steps which made this possible with primary focus on transport phenomena in transistors in presence of high-k/metal gates. Against this backdrop, the interaction of high-k/metal gates with end of roadmap devices would be thoroughly explored. High-k/metal gates have interesting ramifications in the circuit space-from NBTI (negative bias temperature instability) to high-field mobility, the high-k gate induced physical phenomena and their impact on device and circuit performance and reliability would be discussed. To conclude, this talk would also conjecture on the continued scalability of high-k gate stacks for futuristic CMOS device architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207