MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Malignant chondroid syringoma of the skin: Magnetic resonance imaging features

2001· article· en· W2041467475 on OpenAlexaff
Savvas Nicolaou, J. J. Dubec, P L Munk, Jx O'Connell, Mi‐Jeong Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralasian Radiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSweat glandMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingMelanomaSoft tissuePathologyRadiologySWEAT

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skin tumours are usually divided into melanoma and non-melanoma types. Malignancies of the adnexal structures, of which sweat gland tumours are an example, are characterized under the non-melanoma types. Sweat gland malignancies are rare tumours that are usually associated with a poor prognosis. Given the rarity of these tumours, MRI findings of such tumours have not been described previously in the literature. We present a case report of an unusual malignant tumour of sweat gland origin known as a malignant chondroid syringoma of the skin with described MRI features. The MRI features are non-specific depicting intermediate signal intensity, changes on the proton density sequence and increased signal on the T2 and STIR-weighted sequences. Although these imaging features are characteristic of most soft tissue masses MRI can, in most cases, accurately depict the anatomic extent and identify tissue of origin, depth of invasion and relation to adjacent structures, such as muscles and bones. Thus high-resolution MRI of the skin in the future can be extremely helpful in characterizing and staging dermal neoplasms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralasian RadiologySame topicCancer and Skin LesionsFrench-language works237,207