<i>PASP</i>Associate Editor for Instrumentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the past 10 years Dr. J. B. Oke has served the PASP and the community as the Associate Editor for Instrumentation. For personal reasons he has asked to step down, and in consultation with him we sought a new PASP Associate Editor for Instrumentation. We are delighted to announce that the ASP Board of Directors has endorsed the appointment of two extremely wellqualified astronomers to share the responsibility of this position. They are Dr. Daniel Fabricant of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Dr. Harland Epps of UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz. Both have been involved in numerous instrumentation projects and have also been regular contributors to the PASP. The transition to the new Associate Editors for Instrumentation will begin immediately. Dr. Oke has agreed to continue to handle the manuscripts he is now working with, but all new instrumentation papers will be transferred to the new editors. Authors should continue to submit their astronomical instrumentation papers to the PASP ftp site in Victoria (see the instructions at http://pasp.phys.uvic.ca). Similarly, any hardcopy manuscripts should be sent to the main office in Victoria:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it