MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041535689 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m312471200

Mechanism of Chorismate Synthase

2004· article· en· W2041535689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karina Kitzing, Sigrid Auweter, Nikolaus Amrhein, Peter Macheroux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanism (biology)ATP synthaseChemistryBiochemistryEnzymePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chorismate synthase catalyzes the last step in the common shikimate pathway leading to aromatic compounds such as the aromatic amino acids. The reaction consists of the 1,4-anti-elimination of the 3-phosphate group and the C-(6proR) hydrogen from 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate to yield chorismate. Although this reaction does not involve a net redox change, the enzyme has an absolute requirement for reduced flavin mononucleotide, which is not consumed during the reaction. Two invariant histidine residues are found in the active site of the enzyme: His(17) and His(106). Using site-directed mutagenesis, both histidines were replaced by alanine, reducing the activity 10- and 20-fold in the H106A and H17A mutant protein, respectively. Based on the characterization of the two single mutant proteins, it is proposed that His(106) serves to protonate the monoanionic reduced FMN, whereas His(17) protonates the leaving phosphate group of the substrate. An enzymatic reaction mechanism in keeping with the experimental results is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207