MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Erratum to “A Connes-amenable, dual Banach algebra need not have a normal, virtual diagonal”

2014· erratum· en· W2041544357 on OpenAlexaff
Volker Runde

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2014
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDiagonalDual (grammatical number)Pure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldLinguisticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 358 (2006), pp. 391–402, we claimed that, for an amenable, non-compact [ S I N ] [\mathrm {SIN}] -group G G , the dual Banach algebra W A P ( G ) ∗ \mathcal {WAP}(G)^\ast is Connes-amenable, but lacks a normal virtual diagonal. The proof presented contains a gap. In this erratum, we indicate how the faulty proof can be repaired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207