Formation of the charge-transfer exciton in 1,3,5-triphenyl-2-pyrazoline nanocrystals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of 1,3,5-triphenyl-2-pyrazoline (TPP) nanocrystals were prepared by the reprecipitation method. The electronic transitions of TPP nanocrystals have been studied using both absorption and fluorescence spectra. An absorption feature at about 400 nm gradually appeared with increasing nanocrystal size. This feature resulted from the formation of the charge-transfer (CT) exciton in nanocrystals. It was also supported by the longer decay time of the nanocrystal emission from CT compared with that of the solution emission from S1 at 298 K. On the other hand, the different behavior of the molecular ππ* and nπ* transitions originates from the different overlapping modes of the pyrazoline π orbital and n-electron orbital, according to the molecular model calculations. The nanocrystal emission from both the S1 and CT states was found at 77 K; moreover, the emission intensity redistributed from S1 to CT with increasing nanocrystal size. In contrast, at 298 K, only the emission from the CT states was observed, since the thermal fluctuation easily relaxes the excited electrons into CT states through vibration. Key words: reprecipitation method, organic nanocrystals, charge-transfer exciton, size-dependent property.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".