Closely Spaced Circular Cylinders in Cross-Flow and a Universal Wake Number
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the effectiveness of a universal wake number for groups of closely spaced bluff bodes, staggered cylinder configurations with center-to-center pitch ratios of P/D=1.125 and 1.25, and incidence angles from α=0 deg–90 deg, were tested in the subcritical Reynolds number regime. The aerodynamic forces, base pressure, and vortex shedding frequencies were measured for the upstream and downstream cylinders, and were found to be strongly dependent on the incidence angle and small changes in the flow pattern. The Griffin number was found to be an appropriate universal wake number for the closely spaced staggered cylinders, based on the total drag force acting on the two cylinders, and the average base pressure for the two cylinders. The results suggest that the single vortex wake of a pair of closely spaced staggered cylinders is broadly comparable to the wake of a solitary bluff body, and that the universal wake number concept can be extended to groups of closely spaced bluff bodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it