Investigation of tearing mechanisms of woven textile
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tearing resistance is an important parameter for evaluating the reliability of textile structures, especially in the case of protective materials. In order to better understand the individual contribution of the different mechanisms involved in the tearing process, a study of the relation between the fabric and yarn properties characterizing these mechanisms and the tearing energy has been carried out. For that purpose, polyester fabrics with two types of weave patterns and various values of filling yarn density and linear density were characterized in terms of tongue tear energy, yarn and fabric modulus, breaking force and elongation at break, yarn slippage, and yarn jamming. Data for all tested fabrics relied on a unique master curve when the tearing energy was expressed as a function of the transverse yarn slippage force. This demonstrates the strong contribution of transverse yarn slippage to the tearing process, a mechanism which has generally been overlooked in previous works on tearing. Relationships between the tearing energy and the other properties characteristics of the mechanisms involved in tearing of woven textiles were also observed. These results build the path toward the development of models for the tearing energy of textile structures. POLYM. COMPOS., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it