MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041616924 · doi:10.4043/19053-ms

Exploration Potential of the Deepwater Petroleum Systems of Newfoundland and Labrador Margins

2007· article· en· W2041616924 on OpenAlexaffabout
John R. Hogg, Michael E. Enachescu

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinNova scotiaSource rockPaleontologyContinental shelfContinental marginMesozoicRiftOceanographyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The deep and ultra-deep water petroleum potential of the Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) is poorly documented in the literature. Only nine wells were drilled in water deeper than 500 m and only one well has been drilled as an ultradeep, >2000 m, test. However, the available seismic data shows that numerous large structural and stratigraphic traps are located on the slope and rise of the network of interconnected Mesozoic-aged rift basins, situated on the passive margin surrounding the NL continental shelf. Introduction Deepwater exploration plays in Atlantic Canada extend from the Georges Bank's slope in southern Nova Scotia, through the Scotian and Grand Banks slopes, through the Flemish Pass and into Orphan and Hopedale basins in the north (Figure 1). All these basins are situated in a divergent margin setting, similar to the Brazilian or Angolan basin margins. Until recently, the Laurentian Basin found between the Canadian provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and the French Territory of St. Pierre and Miquelon remained unexplored due to a long jurisdictional moratorium. The basin contains an impressive thickness of Jurassic to Tertiary-aged sediments, including source and reservoir rocks and remains undrilled in the Canadian jurisdiction. Two deep water basins located north-east of the Grand Banks of Newfoundland in an intra-continental setting are the Flemish Pass and East Orphan basins. A 2003 well in the Flemish Pass Basin - Mizzen L-11 - has proven the existence of rich Kimmeridgian-aged source rocks and had a 5 m of net oil pay in Late Jurassic sandstone ("Baccalieu" sandstone) reservoirs equivalent to the Jeanne d'Arc Formation in the Jeanne d'Arc Basin. The East Orphan Basin contains an impressive number of large undrilled structures, has seismic sequences that correlate to the Kimmeridgian source rocks in the adjacent basins and is in a midst of an exploration effort by Chevron Canada and its partners. A first well in the basin, the Great Barasway F-66 was drilled during the 2006 fall/winter and was rig released on winter 2007 with a total depth drilled of 7404m but its results remain confidential. The West Orphan Basin has seen drilling only on bold or thinly covered basement blocks and may have Cretaceous mature source rocks within deeper grabens. Figure 1. Location of deepwater basins offshore NL and of the representative deepwater wells Great Barasway F-66, Mizzen L-11 and ODP Leg 210 holes. (available in full paper) Additional deepwater petroleum potential exists in the Hopedale Basin, of Labrador Sea where recent 2D seismic data shows that deep synrift depocenters and thick sedimentary cover continue into the deepwater, where structural and stratigraphic traps are abundant and an oil play may be present. Regional Geology The Newfoundland and Labrador margin developed during the Mesozoic break-up of Pangaea and opening of the North Atlantic Ocean (Enachescu, 1987 and 1988; Tankard and Welsink, 1987; Sinclair, 1988; Grant and McAlpine, 1990; McAlpine, 1990; Enachescu and Dunning, 1994; Enachescu et al., 2005c). Extensional structures and salt diapirism containing thick syn rift and thermal subsidence sedimentary fill characterizes the basins and sub-basins formed along the margin (Atkinson and Fagan, 2000; Hogg and Enachescu, 2001; Enachescu and Fagan, 2005; Enachescu and Hogg, 2005).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207