MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic Model of the Road Feel Generation System in Advanced Driving Simulators

2010· article· en· W2041631839 on OpenAlexaff
Li Zhu, Zhiyong Zhang, Zuo Jun Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)FidelityHigh fidelityComputer scienceSimulationSystem dynamicsIndex (typography)Control engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringComputer securityTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Road feel Generation System (RFGS) is the key subsystem of Advanced Driving Simulators (ADS), and its performance is key index of ADS's fidelity and validity. In this paper, the composition and functions of RFGS is firstly introduced, and then the dynamic model of RFGS based on the Lagrange Equation is provided, and subsequently the simulation and experiment is executed to validating the proposed dynamic model. Based on this model, the effective control algorithm can be developed and the performance of RFGS can be improved, and then the fidelity and validity of ADS can be enhanced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207